Server Reform Proposals

View this post in its original form on The Council website.

The meeting regarding server reform went well, many ideas were contributed, and lots of people showed up. We were even ranked higher than Help on xat’s Popular list. Thank you to everyone who came and contributed. Server reform is never an easy process, though I believe it is crucial to get this done.

Our next task is to vote on the various proposals, which I have attempted to consolidate below into 3 distinctly different plans. Each Council Army is afforded 1 vote for each representative they have submitted (1 to 3 votes).

Proposal #1

  • All armies select 5 servers which they currently own for their Nation
  • The remaining servers become available to all
  • Additional servers may be invaded up to a maximum of 15
  • Each army may only invade 1 server per day

Proposal #2

  • All armies select 10 servers which they currently own for their Nation
  • The remaining servers become available to all
  • Additional servers may be invaded up to a maximum of 15
  • In the event of a war, armies may occupy an additional 5 servers belonging to their opponent(s)

Proposal #3

  • All armies select 15 servers which they currently own for their Nation
  • The remaining servers become available to all
  • Servers owned by 3 or more armies will become disputed, and may only be claimed by winning a free-for-all invasion of the armies disputing ownership
  • In the event of a war, armies may occupy an additional 5 servers belonging to their opponent(s)

How to Vote:

[ALL VOTING MUST BE DONE ON THE COUNCIL WEBSITE]

Important: You must be an approved representative of your army or have expressed permission from the leaders of the army in order to cast your vote.

Name: [Your Club Penguin name or what name you are most-known by]

Army: [What army you are representing]

Vote: [What proposal you are voting for]

~Boomer

Pain is Surrounded by Idiots

10 Responses

  1. Lord Pain Ladies and Gentlemen. The biggest a$$hole in armies and the leader of the National socialist party.

    Like

  2. Would armies still be allowed to share servers if they agree to because of an alliance?

    Boomer: As of right now, yes, I don’t think anyone plans to forbid allies from sharing servers.

    Like

  3. I don’t like this idea. In real life there was no limit of how many regions an empire could conquer, or a limit of how many regions they can have. If an army is strong enough, I’d have no problem with them trying to take all cp servers.

    Like

  4. I agree with Sercan. This doesn’t seem like a good idea. If anything, Server limit should be capped at 50 or 45. I mean, I don’t like that IW or UMA have 100 odd servers between them but cutting it down to 15 is a bit messed up.
    Also, I don’t like how much power retired leaders are getting in this Council.

    Boomer: Actually retired leaders have no power in The Council, I just organize things. I don’t even have a vote 😛

    Like

  5. Yeah same, limiting the possibility of an empire….. R.I.P Ice Warriors, they done our mission for us @ Fiasco :O

    Like

  6. I think it would be better if you better-publicized the list of servers and that convinced people to fight over co-owned servers, creating wars.

    Not limiting the amount of servers for what I see as no reason whatsoever :p

    Like

  7. No me gusta. This is just a bunch of dumb, bureaucratic regulations. I don’t want some Council of Bureaucrats ruling CP warfare.

    Like

  8. boomers the man

    Like

What do YOU think? Comment your opinion!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: