Agenda To Reform the Servers Page

Blue1 here, to lay out the groundwork for phase five of the reform agenda: the dreaded Servers page.

The Servers page has been out of date for a long time now, and no one has worked to really update it due to the fact that many major armies fail to agree on who owns what servers. Just as many cannot agree on the winner of a battle, there is no real accurate verdict on the status of the Servers.

I have thought for a while about what to do with the servers page, and I have spoken with Zak and Blue2 regarding it, and we have come to this decision. We have chosen to leave the choice to you, the viewers of CPA Central, and, more prominently, the leaders of the Top Ten armies and other influential figures.

Your choices are as follows:

1. Do away with the servers page, and let armies decide who owns what amongst themselves.

2. Become the official verdict as to who owns what, and hire one or two individuals to update the page weekly or bi-weekly.

I want to make it clear that, if choice two were to be selected, any disputed servers would probably be decided through a battle between the armies claiming to own it. I also want to explicitly state that we are not imposing and deciding, we are recording. We are keeping one, central record, of who owns what (some 300+ servers between all of the language bases) to avoid major conflicts in the future.

I also want to make it clear that CPAC is not trying to establish any form of political dominance, and that army leaders should not feel pressured to select choice number one or two. I also want to make it clear that this post is for votes, not pointless rants one way or the other, and any comments of such will be removed from this post. We, here at CPAC, are serving you. And in the long run, it makes sense that the Servers page should either be removed entirely or have some impact on armies.

♠Gσ∂ƒaтнєя.Bℓυєsσ¢кωa.тнє.1sт♠

CPA Central CEO

21 Responses

  1. First, now to read the post

    Like

  2. 2nd

    Like

  3. pirates capital is Migrator, we OFFICIALY own that server. also iw claims to own like 50 servers but they don’t

    Like

  4. No 2!

    Like

  5. HIRE ME AS AN AUTHOR

    Like

  6. My army (cabin defenders) owns cabin, it is our capital

    Like

  7. I want to say Option 1, it would make it so that CPAC have a lot less control in CP armies. But if you do option 2 we can finally make warfare more fun. I mean come on, its not fun when every single army declare themselves the winner. Sometimes they do have a claim to do it.

    Like

  8. I say that we go back to the basics, when we used to make battles a lot more fun. Like in Watex or Oagalthorp’s time – we used to have battles not by dancing and doin emotes, but throwing snowballs, etc. Like the Rouge War from summer 2011 and Rouge War II from summer 2012. Just an opinion.

    Like

  9. And in fact it’s a good idea^^

    Like

  10. 10011011100101100

    Like

  11. Number 1.

    Like

  12. I can always work on the page. I’m semi-retired, with no current affiliations with any army. So basically, I got all the time in the world.

    Like

  13. remember my judging thing i emailed you about for agenda blue

    Like

  14. I think we should keep the serves page and have it regularly updated. (option 2) If there are disputes we should have a battle and more than one CPAC rep. (not biased towards one of the battling armies) should judge. All un claimed servers will be up for grabs also too and I think all foreign language servers can be divided up for small and medium armies or not used at all because there are too many of them to keep track of.

    Like

  15. I think we should give all our servers to disney

    Like

  16. Number 1. Armies need to grow up and take care of themselves, they should have people working on keeping their own server pages updated. Not to mention how much torture it would be for the poor souls who would have to browse through tons of armies pages to get those results every few days..

    Like

  17. I choose two. We need someone to tell us who owns what. I see three armies claim control of the same server. This would give CPAC alot more political influence, true. But somebody to do it. Who else is better than CPAC?

    Like

  18. 3, don’t do this at all.

    Like

  19. OPTION 2

    Like

What do YOU think? Comment your opinion!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: